Image: FiscalNote
Last week, members of Congress on both sides of the aisle raised concerns that 88-year-old Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the oldest sitting US senator, may not be as mentally sharp as she used to be.
🔢 By the numbers… Feinstein belongs to the oldest Senate in American history, with a median age of 64.8 at the beginning of last year (including six members over 80).
🌎 The big picture: The US is near the top among other developed countries when it comes to the age of who’s in charge. The EU’s elected lawmakers are an average of 49.5 years old, while the average OECD national leader is almost 25 years younger than President Biden.
Source → (YouGov)
“Meetings at which attendees had to reintroduce themselves — several times — to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). Senate colleagues who aren’t sure she fully recognizes them. A memorial service for a San Francisco official at which Feinstein failed in her remarks to mention the dead woman, whom she had known for decades…
Feinstein is the oldest sitting senator, but she is far from the only official whose mental acuity has been called into question. In their final years in office, Sens. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.) and Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) were widely understood to have faded to the point where their senior staffs were essentially functioning in their place. The current Senate is the oldest ever, and Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), just three months younger than Feinstein, is running for reelection; he would be 95 by the conclusion of his eighth term…
The Feinstein story evokes broader issues: the unwillingness of so many who hold power to cede it voluntarily… and the inability of our political system, in the absence of term limits (which I oppose for other reasons), to deal with those unwilling to recognize when it is time to step down… In public life, the only effective mechanism is the voters themselves.
Which gets to the heart of the puzzle: How are voters supposed to know what’s up when an elected official’s staff works overtime to mask the problem? The instinct to do so is understandable… But this approach is also deeply self-interested. If aides in normal times are only as powerful as the official they serve, they can become extra powerful when the same official is no longer functioning.
These inherent tensions help explain the high turnover from Feinstein’s office in recent years. Covering up is not public service. At a certain point, it is the antithesis.”
“In 2018, California voters panned a much-younger opponent and elected Feinstein — then 85 — to yet another term in the United States Senate. Voters had a clear choice. They chose to stick with Feinstein.
In recent years, multiple stories have raised the question of whether she’s too old to continue serving. Anonymous sources depict Feinstein as someone who has slowed down considerably and become forgetful with age. Her detractors, mostly on the Democratic left, have used these tales to push for Feinstein’s immediate resignation.
Not so fast. Californians elected Feinstein to serve six years. The voters’ mandate — not the rumor mill — should determine the length of her service. In addition, despite accusations that Feinstein is missing a step, she has continued to deliver for California and the nation.
Most recently, Feinstein helped spearhead the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, crucial legislation that passed with 10 Republican votes in a bitterly divided Senate. The legislation, which expired during a government shutdown in 2018, provides $575 million for programs to help women victimized by violent crime. Many politicians spend years in Washington without achieving anything of this magnitude…
If that’s the kind of work product we get from a supposedly age-impaired senator, we’ll take it. On her worst day, she towers over most of the do-nothings in Congress…
Voters have entrusted Feinstein to cast California’s vote on some of the most important issues of the day. We can trust her to decide when it’s time to step down. For now, Feinstein should do as she has always done: Steel her spine against adversity and carry on with the work.”
Source → (YouGov)
“There is a spectacularly toxic arrogance when a lawmaker and the lawmaker’s staff agree that retirement or resignation is unthinkable. Does the name David Wu ring a bell? The guy in the tiger suit? He was a Democratic congressman from Oregon who lost his marbles — pardon me, “struggled with mental health issues” is the preferred euphemism. His “senior staffers were so alarmed by his erratic behavior that they demanded he enter a hospital for psychiatric treatment.” But even at that point, they still didn’t say he shouldn’t keep serving in Congress!
This has little to do with partisanship or ideology; Feinstein is a Democrat and is likely to be replaced by an even more progressive Democrat whenever she leaves the Senate. No, this is about ego and not wanting to see anyone new in that office. But Californians deserve an actual senator, not an 88-year-old woman who doesn’t remember conversations from the day before.
Oh, and out of curiosity, does the current president have any views on when a person becomes too old to effectively perform the duties of a high-level federal-government office?”
“Sen. Dianne Feinstein turns 90 next year, at which point she will be in the penultimate year of her fifth Senate term. Finally, years after the rest of the press was privy to an open Washington secret, Feinstein’s colleagues have ramped up the pressure to force her out…
For her part, Pelosi deemed it "unconscionable" that Feinstein was "subjected to these ridiculous attacks that are beneath the dignity in which she has led and the esteem in which she is held."
In part, Pelosi is practicing the same sort of class solidarity that helped catapult both her and Feinstein, two trust-fund daughters of big-city mayors, to the top of California politics. But if you think about it, she's really just protecting her own kind — a decaying congressional vanguard that she believes deserves wealth, privilege, and power beyond accountability.
Our patricians are offensively old. President Joe Biden turns 80 this year, but this senility crisis is no partisan phenomenon. Were he to run for the presidency again and win, Donald Trump would be 78 at the start of his hypothetical second term. The problem is worse, however, deeper in the swamp. More than half of the Senate consists of senior citizens. They have little to fear about the $20 trillion in debt that they have helped amass, and most of them are very wealthy. Independent of her recently deceased husband, who left behind a billion dollars, Feinstein somehow managed to convert her career in public service into a personal net worth of nearly $100 million. Like Pelosi, a fellow multimillionaire, Feinstein has drawn fire for using her public post to line her own personal pockets.
It would seem that Feinstein has fallen victim to the elder abuse of her enablers. Californians are the other 40 million victims. Pelosi is supposed to be working for them, but this would threaten the preservation of herself and the entire gerontocracy.”
🦠This week, Philadelphia became the first major US city to re-introduce its mask mandate in response to an uptick in cases spurred by the omicron BA 2 variant.
⚖️ A federal jury on Friday failed to convict four men accused of conspiring to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer over Covid restrictions she imposed early in the pandemic.
🏛️ A bipartisan group of senators introduced a measure yesterday to block the Biden administration from ending a pandemic-era immigration policy known as Title 42.
Let's make our relationship official, no 💍 or elaborate proposal required. Learn and stay entertained, for free.👇
All of our news is 100% free and you can unsubscribe anytime; the quiz takes ~10 seconds to complete