đź’¬ Discussion

The Jan. 6 committee's been busy

Wednesday, Jun 29, 2022

Image: Drew Angerer/Getty

The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot at the US Capitol held a surprise sixth public hearing yesterday “to present recently obtained evidence.”

  • The hearing featured testimony from a top aide to Mark Meadows, former President Trump’s chief of staff, who said Trump demanded to be driven to the Capitol building on Jan. 6 with his supporters, but officials ultimately talked him out of it.

🏛️ The big picture: We previously took a 360° look at the Jan. 6 hearings after the first one was held. Here’s everything that’s happened since:

  • Hearing 2 focused on election night in 2020, when former President Trump declared he had won though the election had not yet been called. It featured testimony from former AG William Barr and others.
  • Hearing 3 covered former VP Mike Pence’s resistance to a pressure campaign from Trump to stop the certification of Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, with testimony from Pence’s legal advisers.
  • Hearing 4 took a look at Trump’s attempts to make local elections officials in Georgia, Arizona, and other states reject the 2020 election results, featuring testimony from the officials themselves.
  • Hearing 5 was about Trump’s pressuring the Justice Department to help him overturn the election, with testimony from several former DOJ officials, including the acting Deputy Attorney General at the time.

👀 Looking ahead… The Jan. 6 committee will take a nearly two-week hiatus before holding its final public hearing(s) the week of July 11.

See the 360° View →

Democratic donkey symbol

Sprinkles from the Left

Some commentators argue the fact that Fox News and other conservative publications refused to cover the Jan. 6 hearings sets the stage for that same type of political violence to occur once again.

  • Others contend that the committee has methodically picked apart any Republicans attempting to excuse the events of Jan. 6, and has drawn a direct line of culpability from the riot that day to former President Trump.

“The democracy America has cultivated for 230 years is slipping away, leaving us in danger of becoming a system in which political differences and elections are not resolved by the rule of law but “decided in the streets”…

We didn’t arrive at this precarious moment solely because of Trump. Trump couldn’t have happened if Fox News and Republican elites hadn’t normalized his threats to democratic traditions. Now they continue to do so with their breezy dismissal of the breathtaking revelations of the Jan. 6 hearings.

The conservative elites surely know we are moving toward instability and violence. Yet rather than grapple with the threat, they excuse Trump’s lawlessness once more by resorting to tribalism: There’s nothing new here. The needle isn’t moving.

This has been the Fox News refrain from the start of its brownout coverage of the Jan. 6 hearings…

The pendulum of history is swinging toward the autocratic, at home and abroad, and Republican elites are nattering about “the needle” of short-term partisan gain…

Now, Trump is claiming the Jan. 6 probe is “fake and phony” and the testimony from his former advisers “doctored.” And Trump allies and supporters are helping him get away with it — again.

In doing so, they are effectively guaranteeing more violence. And no side is immune from the growing threat, as the arrest of a man planning to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh reveals.

During Tuesday’s hearing, the committee also heard from Gabriel Sterling, the Georgia election official who, incensed by threats against elections workers, lashed out at Trump and other politicians in a December 2020 video: “Someone’s going to get shot. Someone’s going to get killed. … All of you who have not said a damn word are complicit in this.”

And all who are silent now are complicit in assuring that the horrors of Jan. 6 will recur.”

–Dana Milbank, WaPo

“Until now, Trump’s supporters have told themselves an exculpatory story about Jan. 6 that goes like this: The president sincerely believed he had been robbed of the election. His efforts to reverse the outcome were the result of honest indignation. His “Be there, will be wild!” tweet inviting people to the Jan. 6 rally was just his usual hyperbole, not a threat.

So too — to continue with this story — was his call at the rally itself to “fight like hell,” which was ordinary free speech, not an incitement to riot… Congressional Republicans who questioned the legitimacy of Joe Biden’s victory were no worse than the congressional Democrats who questioned the legitimacy of Trump’s four years earlier.

But the committee’s work made nonsense of that narrative. Trump knew perfectly well that fraud hadn’t caused his defeat: So he had been told, in no uncertain terms, by his loyal attorney general, Bill Barr. The theory that Pence had the authority to stop the counting of electoral votes struck even the author of that theory, John Eastman, as a nonstarter in any court. We heard that Rudy Giuliani admitted he had no evidence of significant fraud. Republicans who aided the president’s attempts sought pardons for themselves, hardly admissions of innocence. Among them, according to Hutchinson, was Meadows himself. Maybe Hutchinson is lying, but she was under oath. Trump supporters may find it easy to dismiss Democrats like Adam Schiff or even anti-Trump conservatives like Judge J. Michael Luttig.

But Hutchinson is a source from within the inner sanctum. On Tuesday, she was a picture of credibility. If Meadows continues to refuse to testify to the committee, that credibility will be enhanced.

Maybe this is where the cult of Trump will begin to crack…

I doubt there will be any sort of moment when the Sean Hannitys and Laura Ingrahams of the world will tell the faithful: We were wrong; we made an idol of the wrong man. But there may be a quiet drifting away. In a moment like this, that might be just enough.”

–Bret Stephens, NY Times
Republican elephant symbol

Sprinkles from the Right

Some commentators argue that the evidence from the hearing is undercut by Democrats’ hypocrisy – they claim the GOP as a whole wanted to overturn a fair election, but also show that it was actually Republicans who stood up to Trump.

  • Others contend that House Republicans played the Jan. 6 hearings perfectly by stepping aside and letting Democrats lay all the blame at Trump’s feet, and can now use the precedent set with the hearings in their favor when they retake Congress after midterm elections.

“Do Democrats want to unfairly besmirch the entire GOP with the Jan. 6 disgrace, while distracting voters from 8.6% inflation and $5-a-gallon gasoline? Yes. Yet did the committee offer a damning look at President Trump’s scheme to stay in office after losing the 2020 election? Also yes. Fresh video of the riot is a reminder that Jan. 6 was a brutal melee of fists and chemical sprays…

The committee appears to be trying to build a case of “seditious conspiracy” against Mr. Trump, but here the evidence isn’t persuasive. Ms. Cheney offered no evidence that Mr. Trump communicated directly with the Oath Keepers or Proud Boys, who were the vanguard of the assault on the Capitol.

The President spread falsehoods about the election. He invited supporters to Washington on Jan. 6, tweeting on Dec. 19 that it “will be wild!” He riled up the crowd and urged it to march on the Capitol. After violence began, he dawdled instead of sending help. Mr. Trump bears responsibility for the mayhem. But inspiring followers to march is not the same as leading a criminal conspiracy.

One irony is that the largely Democratic committee’s evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump’s designs on overturning the election were foiled mainly by Republicans, including many in his Administration. White House lawyers threatened to resign if he fired Justice Department officials who didn’t indulge his fraud theories. GOP state legislators refused to name new electors. His judicial appointees rejected dubious fraud claims. Above all, his own Vice President stood up to Mr. Trump’s public and private pressure not to count electoral votes.”

–WSJ Editorial Board

“House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) played the Jan. 6 committee exactly right. Here are six reasons why.

1) Nobody cares about the Jan. 6 committee…

2) Republicans score points when they talk about what the voters care about. Polls show that inflation, the economy, crime and the southern border are the top concerns for most voters. Keeping his colleagues focused on the big issues is good for McCarthy.

3) Zero percent of Republicans are defending Donald Trump…

4) The hearings haven’t changed the story. Everybody knows the basic narrative. Trump thought he won the election. He was angry when he was declared the loser. He did everything he could to get former Vice President Mike Pence to throw the election to the House, where he thought he could eventually win. And he had a big rally on the National Mall, where a bunch of people stormed the Capitol and ransacked the place…

6) Pelosi’s precedent could come in handy some day. Democrats, especially Senate Democrats, are exceptionally good at establishing procedural precedent that is later exploited by Republicans to achieve their goals. We wouldn’t have so many conservative judges if then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) hadn’t pursued the nuclear strategy on non-Supreme Court judicial filibusters in 2013. It is not clear when and if McCarthy will use the strategy deployed by Pelosi to stack both sides of a select committee to achieve a desired result, for the first time in 232 years of House history. And right now, it serves him well to decry the stunning breach of congressional decorum. But revenge is best served cold, and who knows, once a precedent is set, a precedent is set.”

–John Feehery, partner at EFB Advocacy
Share this!

Recent Discussion stories

Discussion
  |  June 27, 2022

Overturned: The Facts + a 360 View

⚖️ In a 5-4 decision on Friday, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 ruling that provided a constitutional basis for abortion rights.

Kyle Nowak & Peter Nowak
Read More
Discussion
  |  June 24, 2022

Title IX turns 50, gets a face lift

📝 The Biden administration proposed sweeping changes to Title IX, the landmark 1972 legislation preventing sex discrimination in education, on the 50th anniversary of the day President Nixon signed it into law.

Kyle Nowak & Peter Nowak
Read More
Discussion
  |  June 22, 2022

Is crypto truly decentralized?

🪙📋 Crypto networks like bitcoin aren’t as decentralized as many of their proponents claim, according to a new report commissioned by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Kyle Nowak & Peter Nowak
Read More

You've made it this far...

Let's make our relationship official, no 💍 or elaborate proposal required. Learn and stay entertained, for free.👇

All of our news is 100% free and you can unsubscribe anytime; the quiz takes ~10 seconds to complete