Image: NewsNation
On Friday, the Washington Post announced it will no longer endorse presidential candidates, ending a practice that stretched back to 1988.
WaPo is the second major newspaper to recently decide against making a presidential endorsement, following a similar decision by the Los Angeles Times on Wednesday.
The moves have drawn backlash from employees and outside critics. WaPo saw one editor resign in response to Friday’s announcement, while 18 of the paper’s opinion columnists signed on to a combined dissent of the decision. The newspaper’s union also published a statement, attributing the decision to billionaire owner Jeff Bezos and saying it "undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers’ trust, not losing it."
Big picture: Both newspapers have solely endorsed Democrats in recent history – the LA Times every election since 2004, and WaPo since 1988. Overall, the majority of newspapers with opinion pages have endorsed presidential candidates in recent election years (outside of notable exceptions like the Wall Street Journal) – though that trend appears to be reversing.
📊 Flash poll: In your opinion, should newspapers’ opinion pages or editorial boards regularly endorse presidential candidates?
🏥 US infant mortality rates rose by more than expected over the 18 months following “Dobbs v. Jackson,” the SCOTUS ruling that overturned the federal right to an abortion, per a new study.
📵🏫 A growing number of US school districts are cracking down on the use of cellphones among students – though some efforts have received significant pushback from parents.
🇺🇸🏡 Americans see the economy as the biggest issue heading into the 2024 election – largely because a middle-class lifestyle is increasingly becoming unattainable, per Bloomberg analysts.
Let's make our relationship official, no 💍 or elaborate proposal required. Learn and stay entertained, for free.👇
All of our news is 100% free and you can unsubscribe anytime; the quiz takes ~10 seconds to complete