👍 Yes (71%) – "Even though I am young (I’m 17) and have close family members who own guns, I feel that extensive background checks for guns should definitely be an accepted practice. I think of it similarly to how you need a license to drive: everyone needs to be sure you know how to use a car, be safe with it, and will be responsible with it. We have this system for a reason and I believe it should be the same for something as overtly dangerous as a gun. Killing is what guns are made for, and owning one at the very least require more checking and thought as a car."
"It’s high time the loop-hole was closed. I purchased my gun in my name, and when/if I need to sell it I will be doing it through legal channels. All my family members have purchased guns from a friend who is police officer so there wouldn’t be a paper trail. Why? Because they didn’t have to. They aren’t bad people, but my whole point is…if you want the gun then what’s the problem with having your name associated with you. Cars have to be registered to you. The government is never going to round up everyone’s guns, let’s be real. It won’t happen."
"Instead of being vague and individuals not being held responsible for their personal histories, this new administration is delving deeper and being more meticulous in the controversial topic of firearm ownership. In retrospect, when one looks at the very concept of owning a weapon, and the stubborn attempts to protect the “right” to do so, it becomes harder and harder to justify the secrecy and privacy of the act of owning a gun. Unlike healthcare, monetary possessions, and private property, there are no elaborate firewalls defending the justification to own a firearm without any knowledge of the purpose behind such an act. With Biden’s new legislation, one can only hope for a positive outcome of less fun violence, and harder crackdown on those unfit to wield such a dangerous possession."
"There is a mass shooting almost every day in America. If we aren't going to pour money into social services and mental health, then we need to control distribution and ownership of guns. If you can lose your constitutional right to vote from a violent crime, you shouldn't be allowed the constitutional right to bear arms if you are violent and documented in the criminal justice system."
👎 No (21%) – "The US government has demonstrated its willingness to target and punish individuals who challenge the narrative. Things like "social credit" can be used to justify preventing or punishing certain people. The last thing we need is to give the federal government MORE power."
🤷 Unsure/other (8%) – "It's clear safety surrounding guns needs to get better, and I'm for increased background checks, but I also support gun rights and I don't feel like I really understand the implications of this law. Until I really understand the ways this will impact state rights and gun rights and whether or not this could be a federal overreach, I'm going to be wary."
❓ Our question to you: If November’s presidential election were held today, who would you vote for?
❓ Our question to you: Do you agree with the Biden admin’s new plan to forgive an unspecified amount of student loan debt for American borrowers who meet specific criteria?
❓ Our question to you: Are you planning to take time out of your regular schedule to watch the solar eclipse on Monday?
Let's make our relationship official, no 💍 or elaborate proposal required. Learn and stay entertained, for free.👇
All of our news is 100% free and you can unsubscribe anytime; the quiz takes ~10 seconds to complete