Support (19%) – "It's obvious the May/June revisions were rigged. I mean who misses by 250,000?! Either the source data was initially flawed, in which case competence is in question, or the revision was, in which case integrity was. Either way, considering the impact of this data, firing the head of that department would seem to be in order."
Oppose (66%) – "Trump has made a serious accusation without evidence. There should be an investigation to substantiate such charges. I cannot imagine losing my job in a similar fashion. It's terrible and will surely erode our country's ability to trust in its government."
"This is a dangerous step in denying what one might consider negative data and attempting to manipulate the numbers themselves and shape public opinion as a result. I don’t understand why there isn’t more uproar about this. Like going after top law firms or higher education, Pres. Trump is systematically silencing potentially opposing perspectives. This action further obscures the truth and further polarizes the people of our country."
"Our labor statistics should be independent and free from overreach. If not, how can we trust that the data aren’t manipulated for political gain? Ironically, by introducing the possibility of data manipulation for political gain and firing the BLS official, President Trump has made it far more likely that the numbers will be manipulated for political gain"
Unsure/other (15%) – "Politicization of the position is definitely not a good idea. Having said that there should not be extreme revisions. When the revisions are that major then it is reasonable to assume ineptitude. Transparency as to what makes up the jobs report is critical. For example, when the numbers are released - information about which sectors have reported for that month and which ones have not reported for that month should be reported at the same time. If there is one company or sector whose reporting, or lack thereof, is causing the major revisions then they should be publicly named."
❓ Our question to you: In general, do you support or oppose the EPA’s push to rescind its 2009 declaration that greenhouse-gas emissions pose a threat to public health and welfare?
❓ Our question to you (long-form): What are your general thoughts on America’s trade situation following the Trump admin’s latest deadline?
Which of the following best describes your opinion about bias in the media?
Let's make our relationship official, no 💍 or elaborate proposal required. Learn and stay entertained, for free.👇
All of our news is 100% free and you can unsubscribe anytime; the quiz takes ~10 seconds to complete