💬 Discussion

What’s the best way to handle online content moderation?

Monday, Dec 5, 2022

Image: Oworkers

There’s a new sheriff in charge of Twitter: Elon Musk. And so far into his inaugural term, content moderation decisions on the platform are looking a lot different.

Since taking over, Musk has:

  • Laid off an undisclosed number of content moderators.
  • Reinstated over 12,000 previously-banned accounts (including Kanye, who was re-banned on Friday).
  • Facilitated the release of “The Twitter Files,” which provide insight into the company’s internal moderation decisions.

And like flint hitting steel, these moves have reignited debate among congressional lawmakers over Section 230, a law that gives broad legal protections to websites hosting user-generated content.

đŸ€” What is Section 230?
 Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act is one of the most important laws governing how the Internet works in America today. In fact, many experts argue that it’s laid the groundwork for current online giants – Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yelp, TikTok, Reddit, etc. – to thrive.

Essentially, Section 230 means two things: 1) websites can’t be sued for libel or defamation in regards to users’ posts, and 2) websites can moderate themselves by removing posts – as long as they’re acting in “good faith.”

  • For example: if a Twitter user claims Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson skips leg day, Twitter itself can’t be sued for libel/defamation – only the post’s original author can.
  • Twitter also can’t be sued if it decides to remove that user’s post in “good faith” (as decided by a judge, if it comes to that).

📊 Flash poll: In your opinion, what’s the best way for society to handle online content moderation? (Click a link below to record your vote. Results and the best longform responses will be featured in tomorrow's newsletter.)

See a 360° view of what the media is saying →

Democratic donkey symbol

Sprinkles from the Left

  • Some commentators argue that anything but the most careful of alterations to Section 230 would upend the entire Internet landscape as we know it, so lawmakers/SCOTUS need to tread carefully.
  • Others contend that Section 230 is actually a pretty reasonable law all things considered, and argue against the US government fundamentally altering the protections it grants.
Republican elephant symbol

Sprinkles from the Right

  • Some commentators argue that House Republicans should use their newfound advantage this term to address Section 230 and make social media companies more impartial in their moderation decisions rather than slanted towards Democrats.
  • Others contend that the US government needs to stop shielding internet companies from liability for what their users post, arguing that a lawless “Wild West” moderation style is dangerous to society.
Share this!

Recent Discussion stories

Discussion
  |  December 2, 2022

NYC’s plan to tackle mental illness among its homeless

đŸ—œđŸ„ New York City will begin hospitalizing homeless people who appear to be mentally ill and pose a serious risk to themselves or others, Mayor Eric Adams announced this week, saying the effort is meant to address a “mental health crisis” among the city’s homeless population.

Kyle Nowak & Peter Nowak
Read More
Discussion
  |  November 30, 2022

So, about that degree

đŸŽ“đŸ’Œ Job seekers without a college degree, get ready for some good news. According to an analysis by the Burning Glass Institute, 41% of current US job postings require a college degree, down from 46% at the start of 2019.

Kyle Nowak & Peter Nowak
Read More
Discussion
  |  November 28, 2022

Consumers, how are we feeling?

🛍 This past weekend's shopping numbers are in. And to quickly recap: an estimated 166 million Americans hunted for a come-up, then popped some tags with only a little money in their pocket. Someplace somewhere, Macklemore must be proud.

Peter Nowak & Kyle Nowak
Read More

You've made it this far...

Let's make our relationship official, no 💍 or elaborate proposal required. Learn and stay entertained, for free.👇

All of our news is 100% free and you can unsubscribe anytime; the quiz takes ~10 seconds to complete